Despite claims of a lack of consistency in stewarding, the FIA is against calls for permanent stewards.

The lack of an investigation into Max Verstappen's actions during the Brazilian Grand Prix has left drivers questioning exactly what is allowed and what isn't, and while Michael Masi has attempted to explain the situation, the feeling among the drivers is that there remains a lack of consistency in terms of stewarding.

Consequently there have been calls for the appointment of a team of permanent stewards in the hope that a fixed team would look at every incident with the same eyes.

That said, the sport did previously have a fixed panel of stewards but this was abandoned over claims of bias towards certain teams and drivers. Since then, the sport has favoured a rotating panel selected from an established pool, the structure at each race consisting of a chairman, a former driver and two others usually provided by the local motorsport body.

Masi is not in favour of the proposal for a permanent panel.

"I think you'll find, and there were some wise words about those that operated under a permanent stewards panel, that there was perceived bias when there was a permanent steward," said the Australian.

"I think the stewarding that we have now with the pool of four chairman, that we shared the pool of driver, stewards, and all of that, the way all the chairman meet regularly," he added. "We need to take a step back and remember that's it's the first time in a long time we are in a real championship fight between two amazing drivers, two fantastic teams.

"As a regulator, last time I saw, there's no regulator in the world that's going to be popular," he continued. "Regardless if you're a referee, if you're a regulator of any sport, that's part of the role that we fulfil, and from our perspective there will always be slight differences but, at the end of the day, the stewards are there to make those decisions."

McLaren boss, Andreas Seidl agrees.

"To be honest, my opinion hasn't changed," he tells Speedcafe.com, "I don't think that not having permanent stewards is the issue there, to be honest.

"As far as I understand, whenever there's a case popping up the first thing the stewards are doing is going back to the history of cases and see where precedents and check if this is comparable or not, in order to try to be consistent.

"I understand also so that after each race weekend, there's a lot of exchange all the steward in order to make sure everyone is on the same level of information and understands what happened in detail.

"That's why I don't think that is that's a big issue we are having here, to be honest."

"In Brazil, I very much rate (Tim) Meyer, who was the head steward there," added Toto Wolff, "I think it was just the circumstances were bizarre.

"They are under so much pressure," he continued. "I wouldn't want to say about any stewards that they're good or bad because I wouldn't want to be in a steward seat, because somebody is always going to complain.

"Being a steward is a professional job," he added, "and it should be well paid, the pressure should be rewarded. Whether it's a permanent institution, I don't know, but in any case, the best people should be doing it.

"And I think we've seen many, many good stewards and I still trust in any outcome."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by Editor, 28/11/2021 10:16

"@ trackrecords

And what the hell is wrong with that?

Most of my knowledge of the sport comes from Grand Prix, Le Mans, Bobby Deerfield, Winning, Checkpoint and the into to The Persuaders."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by trackrecords, 28/11/2021 9:49

"I remember at one BGP, I was told by someone very much in the know, that one of the Stewards for the weekend was a Mumbai cinema owner..."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Wokingchap, 26/11/2021 10:44

"@Mad Matt....i agree, thats a sensible suggestion.... possibly too sensible."

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Editor, 26/11/2021 9:57

"The article states...

"the structure at each race consisting of a chairman, a former driver and two others usually provided by the local motorsport body.""

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by jcr, 26/11/2021 9:55

"@Roli
There is one driver on the panel,
But not necessarily an F1 driver
"

Rating: Positive (2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by KKK, 25/11/2021 13:30

"A few years ago I remember at all F1 races there was an ex F1 driver to assist the Chief Steward. Is still going on? "

Rating: Positive (2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Mad Matt, 25/11/2021 13:22

"I think it would make sense to have several permanent stewards and a few rotating, or perhaps regular meetings of those in the pool to go through decisions in order to improve consistency.

I accept it will never be perfect and I'd rather the occasional error than weeks of protests and appeals after the race.... but at the moment it feels like the FIA are sticking their fingers in their ears and going "la-la-la I can't hear you"."

Rating: Positive (3) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

FIA cool on permanent stewards

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page