Site logo

Drivers unimpressed by Ben Sulayem's attitude

NEWS STORY
01/05/2025

George Russell and Lewis Hamilton are left unimpressed by FIA president's attitude as they claim drivers should have more say in the sport.

For as long as we can remember, we have said that the drivers - if only through their 'union', the Grand Prix Drivers' Association (GPDA) - should have a say in the running of F1, particularly as they are at the coal face.

Be it circuits, technical regulations, safety or even the schedule, for years drivers have meekly accepted what was demanded of them.

However, seemingly the one good thing about Mohammed ben Sulayem's presidency is that his increasing, dictatorial attitude towards the sport has seen the drivers unite and find a voice.

Today, in Miami, while discussing what appears to be some form of U-turn over the swearing ban, Hamilton and Russell expressed theirs, and their colleagues', feelings over a range of issues.

"I think ultimately, the GPDA is very unified," said Hamilton. "Ultimately we want to be able to work closely with the FIA. I think everyone, all of us, want to continue to work together and make the sport better, and of course we've faced a bit of an uphill challenge in that communication over time," he added.

"Ultimately, we don't hold a power seat at the table, and that needs to change, in my opinion. So we, you know, if you look at other sports that have unions, that may be something that comes into play at some stage.

"As I said, we don't want to control things," he insisted, "we just want to collaborate with them more and have our voices heard.

"Ultimately, people making decisions for others that have never been in that position, it's good to have the point of view from the drivers' perspective, and that's all we try to give."

Despite claiming that he had conferred with drivers from the various FIA championship, Russell said there has been no dialogue with Ben Sulayem since the open letter sent late last year. In the letter, the GPDA asked that drivers be respected and treated properly and not like children, a reference to the various bans being introduced, whilst also questioning where the money from fines was going.

The situation will not have been helped by the subsequent announcement of escalating fines for breaches of the new regulations, including suspension.

"It feels like it's unprecedented times we've had in the last 18 months with what's been changing, what's happening," said Russell. "I think when the GPDA was founded years ago, it wasn't really to talk about politics, it was to talk about safety, it was to talk about improvements of the sport, improvements of racing.

"Especially myself, I find myself talking about topics that I didn't really have any intention of talking about," he admitted, "but we find ourselves in a time where we're not focused on the things why we're all here.

"We're here to go racing, we're here to create the best show for the fans, to have the fastest cars, the safest cars, you know, the best technology, the best engineering, and yet we talk about fines and punishments and swearing.

"So yeah, maybe something should change. We're open to it, but we just ultimately want the best for the sport."

Rather than social media posts and press releases, the drivers want direct dialogue and action.

"Obviously we want to see these things put into action, rather than saying, 'we're considering things'," said Russell. "We all consider a lot of things. We're clear we want changes, and once they are implemented, then we'll comment on it. But for the time being, it's being considered so the words don't mean anything until the change has been made.

"Collectively, we've not spoken any further since the open letter that was sent out. So whether that post is the response, I'm not too sure.

"It would be great if changes were made and the drivers were at least heard and I think that's just in the best interest for the sport and ensuring that some common sense is applied to these situations.

"All of us, we can comment on it when we see the action being taken, rather than just the consideration."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by kenji, 03/05/2025 7:15

"@Pavlo... I'm not sure but I seem to recall that English was made the official language of all FIA/F! communications. What I'm uncertain of is the rule governing the usage of swear words, for example is the F word able to be expressed in French? The S word is often quoted in French, I use it myself often in cases where it may cause offence. It's all a nonsense really. Swear words used carefully, are a part of the beauty of the English language which is of itself a massive gift to humankind, one of great value and importance. My only quibble is that increased common usage lessens the dramatic effect when used chosen judiciously in emphasis."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Pavlo, 02/05/2025 19:11

"@kenji: far better to do what WRC drivers did - they just refused to talk to the media otherwise than their language, which practically cancelled press conferences. Really, no one is obliged to know English, are they?
Then they can all collectively answer interviews like Max last time. They are quite rich people, for sure they can find one lawyer that will offer lots of actions formally legal but painful for FIA."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by kenji, 02/05/2025 13:58

"On further musing...what would happen if the twenty drivers and ten TP's all dropped multiple F Bombs in pressers and then when the fines were issued, they refused to pay...What could MBS and his 'purity' warriors do? "

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by kenji, 02/05/2025 1:06

"It's all far too 'wishy washy'. The drivers need to collectively muscle up. They sent a letter of request and there's been no reply! It now needs to be followed up with a demand otherwise there will be consequences. I would suggest that they recruit Alan Jones as their rep.as he's not afraid to rustle a few feathers especially the peacocks strutting the FIA stage."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 01/05/2025 22:32

"It boils down to respect. MBS and Liberty have none of that for the drivers. "

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by KKK, 01/05/2025 22:07

"Totally agree with Lewis. Inow wonder if he is shut down by the powers that be! Hope not."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Wokingchap, 01/05/2025 22:05

"Fully with them and the GPDA on this one."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms