Site logo

Norris on pole for Mexico City Grand Prix

NEWS STORY
25/10/2025

Ahead of today's qualifying session the air temperature is 26 degrees C while the track temperature is 50 degrees.

Norris was quickest earlier, and while his pace was impressive we must not forget that, lie yesterday, over the next hour the track is going to be constantly evolving.

Nonetheless, being 0.6s up on his teammate and Verstappen is going to be a tremendous boost to his confidence.

Hamilton was second as Ferrari continue to look good, while Russell and Antonelli were very much in the mix.

Drivers continue to struggle for grip however, most notably Verstappen, but he is not alone with Albon twice spoiling his flying laps.

Throw in track limits and traffic and we should be in for an interesting session.

Stroll gets Q1 underway, followed by Alonso, Gasly, Colapinto and Ocon, the Spaniard having missed much of this morning's session with a technical issue.

Stroll posts a benchmark 18.815, however Alonso responds with a 17.936.

Colapinto goes second but is demoted when Bearman goes top with a 17.765.

Bortoleto has his time deleted for exceeding track limits at Turn 12.

Norris goes purple in S1, his teammate already 0.4s down. The Briton crosses the line at 17.147, while Piastri goes third with a 17.850, 0.703s down.

Albon goes third and Hamilton fifth as Leclerc makes a mistake at Turn 13. Despite that error the Monegasque posts a 17.285 to go second.

Lawson goes third and Hadjar fourth.

Replay shows Hamilton running wide in Turn 12.

Tsunoda goes fifth as his teammate begins his first flying lap. Verstappen crosses the line at 17.306 to go third as Sainz goes fourth. Verstappen was quickest in S3.

Antonelli goes sixth with a 17.524 but is demoted when his teammate stops the clock at 17.194 to go second.

Quickest in the final two sectors Bearman goes top with a 17.106 as Hamilton says he is struggling with his tyres.

Norris reclaims the top spot with a 16.899.

Piastri goes third (17.158), but is leapfrogged by Leclerc (17.024).

Verstappen gets the final assault underway, as Hadjar goes quickest in S2. The RB driver goes top with a 16.733, while his teammate claims third.

Norris heads out again.

No offence to the RB pair but the track is clearly improving.

Verstappen goes fifth with a 17.076, the world champion still struggling with understeer.

Tsunoda goes ninth as the Mercedes pair head out, Antonelli currently 15th.

Antonelli goes eleventh and Sainz eighth, as Gasly fails to make the cut.

Hulkenberg goes eleventh and Ocon third as Stroll aborts.

Russell goes second, but is demoted by Hamilton.

Alonso goes twelfth as Piastri aborts.

Albon fails to improve on seventeenth, which means Antonelli survives to Q2.

Flavio Briatore is clearly unimpressed as Colapinto goes off and takes a wild, bumpy ride over the kerbs.

Quickest is Hadjar, ahead of Hamilton, Russell, Norris, Ocon, Lawson, Leclerc, Bearman, Verstappen and Piastri... which would make a pretty good grid.

We lose Bortoleto, Albon, Gasly, Stroll and Colapinto.

Hadjar gets Q2 underway, followed by his RB teammate. Eventually, Hulkenberg, Alonso, Hamilton and Verstappen follow.

Hadjar posts a benchmark 17.137, while his teammate opts to pit.

A 17.016 sees Hulkenberg go top as Alonso goes third with a 17.820.

Hamilton goes second but is demoted when Verstappen stops the clock at 16.824.

Leclerc posts a 16.658 to go top as Norris posts purples in S1 and S2. As Sainz goes second (16.758), Norris crosses the line at 16.252.

Piastri goes ninth with a 17.286, but is demoted by Russell (17.137), while Antonelli 14th.

Piastri reports what he thinks is a PU issue in Turn 5.

Lawson, who has yet to post a time, heads out. However, he subsequently aborts again. "Zero grip," he reports.

With 4 minutes remaining there is a significant queue in the pitlane. At the end of the queue is Piastri who will be cutting it mighty close. The Australian is currently tenth.

Verstappen goes second with a 16.505, 0.353s down on Norris.

Beaman goes fifth, Hamilton second and Ocon eighth.

Antonelli goes sixth, Russell third and Sainz fifth.

Leclerc goes sixth, Tsunoda tenth and Alonso thirteenth.

Piastri goes seventh, thereby demoting Tsunoda.

Quickest is Norris, ahead of Hamilton, Russell, Verstappen, Sainz, Leclerc, Piastri, Antonelli, Bearman and Hadjar.

We lose Tsunoda, Ocon, Hulkenberg, Alonso and Lawson.

Check out our Saturday gallery from Mexico City here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Cobra Driver, 27/10/2025 19:18

"Want to hear my pet Piastri/Norris Theory? Okay here goes. The 2025 season starts with 2 McLaren drivers, 1 Brit, 1 Aussie. Tough, but friendly competition for the first half, or so. Piastri pulls ahead of Norris and all is well, and they are outpacing the other drivers. British McLaren wins the Constructor's Championship thanks to Piastri and Norris. Piastri begins to have issues with his car's performance. He changes his driving style somewhat to compensate. The Mexican GP shows Norris one point up. My theory is that, once McLaren has secured the Constructor's Championship, McLaren management has no need for two competitive drivers so the Brit Norris becomes the favourite son. Perfect season. British team, Constructor's Championship and a British driver wins the driver's crown. Okay, have at it.
"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Chester, 26/10/2025 14:20

"@Ricardo. You caught me writing with unbridled emotion. I have zero proof except my gut. But I do have great faith in my gut.
A few weeks back I did find my belief that Oscar was infallible was burst like a bubble. Despite that slap of reality, I find it exceedingly strange that Oscar's qualy is so far back of Lando.

Now there is a glimmer of hope that I'm wrong. Many drivers complained on sliding yesterday. It juts may be possible that Lando is more comfortable with that condition than Oscar- and that is at work.

However, if this gap between Lando and Oscar continues into Interlagos, then indeed something smells."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/10/2025 13:16

"@kenji - When you say “the stopwatch is all the proof you need,” that actually means there isn’t any evidence beyond the result itself! A gap in lap time doesn’t prove tampering any more than it proves a driver’s confidence hasn’t dipped, it just tells us someone was slower on that lap.

Are you going to explain to us what (and how) McLaren is doing whatever you believe it’s doing to Piastri’s car without the vast amount of data from telemetry giving the game away? "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by kenji, 26/10/2025 12:59

"@ Chester....Yes, I agree. The 'stop watch' is all the proof you need. Like so many others, so called 'pundits" included, the variance is what rings the alarm bells.With so much at stake an all embracing policy of 'play up and play the ball 'is an outdated notion as the precedent was set up a very long time ago by Jardine and Larwood and again as recently as the opening race in Melbourne.One needs to remember that McLaren are desperate for a result to fully justify an 8 year mega investment in Norris. To have that goal upset by a quietly spoken neo Colonial says it all really. In so many cases the fact that 'nothing is as it seems' makes certain sense...."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Tyrbiter, 26/10/2025 12:58

"Anyone remember the McLaren M23 oil coolers that caused James Hunt so much trouble due to being moved 1/2" in mid-1976?"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/10/2025 12:20

"@Chester – You mention “further proof” of tampering. Out of interest, what proof have you seen so far?"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Chester, 26/10/2025 10:52

"Thank you, Editor. I was left is disbelief yesterday after qualifying, and had the EXACT same feelings about something not being right.

Something is rotten somewhere. If there is any further proof that there is tampering, I am done forever."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/10/2025 9:43

"@Editor – Thanks for clarifying. That distinction helps. I had read the article as implying something mechanical. It sounds like we both agree nothing physical could go unnoticed in an operation like McLaren’s."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Editor, 26/10/2025 8:25

"@ Ricardo_sanchez

As you say, McLaren has over a thousand employees and of course there is the FIA.

However, I wasn't actually referring to anything physical, for sometimes, much like we are witnessing with the Palou case, words are enough.

I am not a fan of Piastri or indeed of most of the drivers on the grid, but I find this sudden loss of form to be more than the mystery that he describes.

That's my two-penneth, I will not be getting involved in any dialogues as I don't have any skin in the game, so to speak, I just find it all very, very strange."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/10/2025 7:38

"@kenji - surely the telemetry, setup sheets, and scrutineering data would show any change in ride height instantly, and both the engineers and the FIA would have flagged it?

My understanding is that modern F1 telemetry is both comprehensive and transparent: including suspension travel, aero load, rake angle etc. Wouldn't any unexplained alteration to height be impossible to hide within McLaren (1,000 + staff) and from the FIA technical team? "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by Schrodinger's cat, 26/10/2025 6:29

"I wonder, if before the Constructors Championship was won, Norris was sharing his setup with Piastri, but is not doing that now.

Perhaps, Norris, with more experience, is better at setting up his car than Piastri. You can understand why Norris wouldn't want to share his setup, when Piastri is beating him with the same setup.

That could explain why Piastri can no longer match Norris speed. "

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by kenji, 26/10/2025 4:25

"@Editor....you make some extremely pertinent observations there and ones with which I totally concur. To be brutally frank I simply don't believe that Piastri's lack of performance is down to his inability to drive the car competetively. If the gaps were marginal then yes, entirely possible. Norris can be a very fast driver at times but for the gaps to be of such magnitude something is seriously amiss!!! Last week I read a report which claimed that Piastri's ride height levels at COTA had been altered unknown to both driver and Stallard with a relatively marginal loss per lap but over the course of a full race distance were substantial. That report was unverified. Now what we are seeing are huge gaps, six tenths here in Mexico quali. Now that is relatively huge and a margin that I seriously doubt is down solely to the driver. Like the editor here, 'I don't believe it'.... is unassisted. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/10/2025 0:15

"@editor - you raise some strong implications about what might be happening with Piastri’s car. Could you please expand a bit on that point?

When you say it feels that “strings are being pulled”, are you suggesting that there could be deliberate intervention somewhere?

Given the extent of telemetry and data-sharing within teams, surely any intentional manipulation would be obvious to hundreds of people inside the operation and impossible to hide? "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms