Site logo

F1 already looking at 2026 engine convergence

NEWS STORY
24/04/2025

In a bid to prevent one-make domination, as happened post 2014, F1 is looking at engine convergence in 2026 and beyond.

Of the five grands prix this season Mercedes has won four. Indeed, since the beginning of the hybrid era in 2014, the German manufacturer has won 128 of the 233 races (54.9%).

This compares to Renault, which has won 16 (7.3%), Ferrari 23 (9.9%) and Honda 65 (27.9%).

Fearing that the new era could see another period of domination like that which Mercedes has enjoyed, even ahead of the 2026 overhaul the need for performance converging is already being considered.

When Fred Vasseur was asked in Jeddah about talk of equalising engine performance, the Frenchman's keen sense of humour was as to the fore as ever.

"I was trying to ask Andy before what the level of performance of the Honda engine is, but he didn't want to reply," joked the Frenchman as he sat alongside Aston Martin boss, and former boss at Mercedes HPP, Andy Cowell, whose team will be using Honda power units next season.

"And you didn't tell me the level of performance you're at!" laughed the Briton.

"Honestly, I think it's impossible to have a precise idea about the performance level of next year's cars and on the engine," admitted the Frenchman.

"We are not in a situation where we're just speaking about the ICE," he continued. "Drivability will be key, temperature will be key, the ICE will be key, the battery will be key. And I'm not sure that anyone knows what the others are doing.

"You can be king of the place in 2025, but the most important is 2026," he warned.

"It's very hard to just say it's about crank power, or battery, or heat rejection," added Cowell. "All of these parameters are traded off.

"There are compromises in order to come up with the fastest race car. And we're still many months away from the introduction point. I imagine that every single engineering team is looking at what they've got and going, "Ah, there are all these performance ideas. How do we get those in?" Then there will be a load of reliability issues - how do we solve those?

"The supply chain will be screaming because you're asking for both performance and reliability," he continued. "You just push really, really hard, and every single minute of every day counts.

"There are a lot of minutes before the first race. So someone who's in front at the moment might drop back. Someone who's behind at the moment might go forward. But how do you measure it?

"At the end of the day, it will be Melbourne 2026, in qualifying, that'll be the first time we really see all the different car types with the power units, with the new aero, new tyres, and so on and that's where the stopwatch will tell us where everybody is at with their cars."

In its determination to level the playing field and avoid a repeat of 2014, F1 CEO, Stefano Domenicali admits that nothing is off the table.

"Nothing prevents us from working to improve the package," he told Autosport. "The FIA, together with the manufacturers and teams, can always assess if there are areas for improvement.

"We're on the brink of a major regulatory shift," he added, "and I personally believe it's crucial that the system allows for a faster recovery if a manufacturer falls behind significantly. That's an issue we must address quickly, it could happen to anyone.

"Having one dominant team for too long is bad for everyone," he admitted. "Our sport is growing incredibly and has become a global benchmark. We should be proud of that, but also cautious."

And with Pirelli's Mario Isola admitting that the sport's sole tyre supplier, along with all key stakeholders in the sport, "must create the conditions for unpredictable and spectacular races" and that the Italian tyre manufacturer "wants to be proactive in this regard", the days of a genuine Formula One Script Unit draw aver closer.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by kenji, 26/04/2025 5:46

"How about we opt for a new handicap system? How about the fastest cars starting from the rear of the field instead of at the front? Then we'd see real racing and the rats and mice would be in for a possible result? Imagine you're racing with a mid field team and you front up each and every race knowing that points are not going to be accessible unless there are massive 'mess ups' amongst the front runners. Handicaps would be a race by race movable feature depending on previous results so at the end of the year there would be possibly no definitive winner until the last couple of races. Now that would be rather exciting.....I raced yachts for quite a few years and the SORHR were amazing. Considering the complexities of tactics/strategies mixed with ever changing weather experienced in short offshore yacht racing the results were incredibly close and thrilling! Those were the days when sometimes the race to the finish line came down to minutes/secs after a 6hr race."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Max Noble, 26/04/2025 4:20

"…a return of the engine development “token” system perhaps? That was such a joy and had fans in raptures…"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by BillH, 26/04/2025 1:44

"It is inevitable that there will be strengths and weaknesses across every team in terms of the four main areas (chassis, tire (management), power unit, driver) in what is now the last single seater prototype series.
As with RB 2023 and most of the Ferrari 2000 - 2004, F1 didn't even get an inter team battle let alone intra team, that made F1 quite dull.
The true "racer" teams do not want a well performing team's wings clipped, as it is up to the slower teams to catch up.
Something that may or may not cut costs on R&D and bring in a level of convergence is if at season start, the FIA released all the plans of all the cars and power units to each of the teams.
This could be repeated at season end with the idea that eventually, a new team in a steady regulation time frame could be ready to go sooner or a slow team could make up ground.
"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Spindoctor, 25/04/2025 11:24

"Here we go again!
Without a wheel turning in a 2026-spec car they're positing a change to the rules to prevent the best team(s) winning?

Mercedes dominated for several years, RBR have been dominant for the last few years, now McLaren has the (marginally) fastest car. Oh & let's not forget the skills of the drivers too. Formula 1, like any other Sport, isn't susceptible to simplistic 'solutions' to the 'problem' of some teams\cars\drivers being better than others: the whole point of the 'game' is to be better!


"

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by MossMan, 25/04/2025 11:21

"@RP - I don't think that's the type of convergence they're talking about at all - they're not discussing performance handicaps AFAICT. Hopefully this will be more in terms of clarity of what's allowed and within which restrictions, not the usual outlawing/restricting features that one team has and the others don't."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by RP, 24/04/2025 19:58

"Sorry, I meant F1 is now proposing a convergence. I'm old"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by RP, 24/04/2025 19:54

"Wow! So,as we see mostly boring races at the end of the former regulations, F1 is not proposing a convergence so no one can dominate - this is a sport and, in every sport Im", im familiar, the better team, better person, better designer generally win.
Engines have converged in performance (except, perhaps Alpine?) over the last four years. More restrictions on design intended to hamstring engineers have further bunched up the cars but overtaking is difficult even with DRS.
Somewhere between the lines is Euro (or dollar) signs. Profits are up but never enough, right. Lets say the four engine manufactures have 200-300 engineers each. Wouldn't the convergence "Problem be solved. Oh, and look at all the money that would be saved. Then, if Max still runs away with everything, we could put a 30kg lead weight in the car to assist with "convergence". Or lighter driver's would have weights added.
Years ago, you could glance at an F1 car and know it was a Ferrari or Vanwall or Mercedez. These manufacturers enter for their own purposes - advertising, perhaps and that is fine. Dominance can be tiring but when Schumacher, Ferrari, Brawn and Totd were winning everything, if I were working for Williams I would be insulted if they were penalized for being best.
Red Bull pit stops, before the chaos, were great to watch. Less than half a second separating the Team from the others. The RB design with Newey et al. Adrian wasn't the whole design team but his leaderhsip and insights lifted them all. The diversity of design makes it interesting to me. Shame on the money barons - when is enough enough. For them, NEVER."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms