As the FIA introduces its much-anticipated new flexing test, the governing body's Single Seater Director, Nikolas Tombazis explains why the test has been introduced.
The test is the latest in a series of crackdowns as a result of concern over the possibility of some teams benefiting from flexing. Following the tests introduced in China and Japan, the latest is the most stringent of all and is expected to spring a few surprises in terms of performance.
"When championship battles become intense, teams tend to focus on each other's cars a lot, and naturally they raise concerns," admits Tombazis, "and over the latter half of the (2024) season we came to the conclusion that we needed to toughen a bit more the tests for 2025.
Rear wing deformation was originally addressed by the 2025 regulations, Article 3.15.17 specifying that if 75Kg of vertical load were to be applied on either extremity of the rear wing mainplane, the distance between the mainplane and the flap - also known as 'slot gap' - should not vary by more than 2mm.
"The 2025 regulations were designed to counteract the so-called 'mini-DRS effect' that became quite a talking point in the autumn of last year," he continues, referring to claims that rear wings were flexing to the degree that under load a drag reducing gap was appearing between rear wing elements.
"That test was applied from the start of the season, but it soon became apparent it was insufficient," he admits.
Consequently, cameras were mounted on the cars the at the practice sessions in Australia, and following analysis of the footage the FIA concluded that even tougher tests were needed. At the Chinese Grand Prix, the tolerance was reduced to 0.75mm and in Japan to 0.5mm.
However, there was also the question of flexing to the front wings, and this is also being addressed from this weekend.
"Over a sequence of races at and following the Belgian Grand Prix we installed cameras on the front wings of all cars and again we concluded that the tests would need to be toughened," says Tombazis. "That conclusion was arrived at quite late in the year, however, and we felt that if we had introduced extra tests at the start of this season, it would have been tough on teams and may have led to existing front wings being scrapped, and extra expense. Therefore, we felt that deferred introduction was more sensible."
The 2025 Technical Regulations originally stated that when 100kg of load is applied symmetrically to both sides of the car the vertical deflection must be no more than 15mm and when the load is applied to only one side of the car the vertical deflection must be no more than 20mm. From this weekend, when the load is applied symmetrically to both sides of the car the vertical deflection must be no more than 10mm and applied to only one side of the car the vertical deflection must be no more than 15mm.
In terms of front wing flap flexibility, the regulations stated that "any part of the trailing edge of any front wing flap may deflect no more than 5mm, when measured along the loading axis, when a 6kg point load is applied normal to the flap". From this weekend the amount of permitted deflection drops to just 3mm.
While this might seem insignificant, Tombazis is confident a line can be drawn under the issue for the remainder of the year.
"Obviously it is fair for the FIA to add more flexibility tests or stiffness tests when it judges that a certain area may be getting exploited a bit too much," he says, "but yes, we hope it will be the last time we'll do anything for this year."
"We check the teams at various points across the season," he adds, "and we ask them to bring certain components along and we'll check them in isolation and sometimes test them on the whole car. We frequently test in parc fermé conditions, either on Saturday after qualifying or Sunday morning, as obviously, in parc fermé teams cannot make changes to their car. That ensures that they're not fitting a stiff wing for the test and running something else in the race. We also occasionally conduct checks after a race if we feel there is a reason to do so. Those tests would be static load tests, as defined in Article 3.15 of the Technical Regulations.
"There are areas where the propensity to have flexible components is less pronounced, because of the straight-line mode, for example and therefore in some areas it may be that at some point we choose to ease the toughness of the tests," he admits. "But fundamentally the philosophy is the same. We need to be vigilant, and we need to keep testing. In fact, we are defining the loads for next year now. So, we will see how the first evolves and if we need to react to maintain fairness, then we will do so."
Picture Credit: FIA
sign in