Site logo

This is not racing, insists Verstappen

NEWS STORY
16/03/2026

Retirement due to cooling issue only adds to Max Verstappen's dislike of new rules.

Another poor start saw the Dutchman drop five places by the end of the first lap, but he subsequently worked his way through the field, battling drivers he had probably never encountered before, until retiring on Lap 45, while running sixth, with a cooling issue.

A critic of the rules overhaul for well over a year, a pointless afternoon in Shanghai did little to change his opinion of F1 2026.

"It's still terrible," he told reporters. "I don't know, if someone likes this then you really don't know what racing is about," he added. "It's not fun at all. It's playing Mario Kart. This is not racing.

"Look at the racing," he added. "You are boosting past, then you run out of battery the next straight. They boost past you again. For me, it's just a joke."

While the cars themselves are actually better than before, it is the 50/50 split between ICE and electrical power, the need to constantly harvest energy, that is destroying the sport in the Dutchman's eyes, and indeed in the eyes of many other drivers and fans.

As was the case last week, posts on X by the official F1 account praising the race saw negative comments from fans quickly hidden.

The four-time world champion's mood wasn't helped by Mercedes continued domination, which not only recalls the German team's success at the beginning of the hybrid era, but has many wondering if it is sandbagging and has even more up its sleeve.

"It's just Kimi or George that is winning, right?" he said. "It's not really back and forth. They're miles ahead of the field. It's just that Ferrari sometimes has these good starts that they push themselves in front, and then it takes a few laps to sort it all out... like I said, this has nothing to do with racing.

"I would say the same if I would be winning races," he insisted, "because I care about the racing product. It's not about being upset of where I am, because I'm actually fighting even more now, of course. So you get to understand what you have to do and what it is about even more. For me, it's really a joke."

Ably backed by the media, F1 continues to focus on the sheer number of overtakes we are witnessing even though they are basically fake, with one driver having to slow in order to harvest energy, thereby allowing his opponent to pass.

Indeed, as was the case in Melbourne, the TV coverage appeared carefully managed, the onboards cutting away as drivers needed to slow while at full speed on the straights. Meanwhile, radio interaction has all but vanished.

"I hope they don't think like that, because it will eventually ruin the sport," said Verstappen of the overtake tally. "It will come and bite them back in the ass.

"For me, as long as we can just communicate with them and make sure that we are working on some solutions that will help a lot," he added. "But it's also going to be very difficult for everyone to agree, of course.

"Not everyone needs to agree, but most of the people have to agree to make changes. But like I said, it's political, right? Some people feel they have the advantage now, and they want to, of course, use that, rightly so. I get that, I'm not stupid. At the same time, if you look at it for the sport, it's just not good."

With the cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian races, the sport has the opportunity to make changes. Asked if a few small changes might help, Verstappen said: "You can help it a little bit, but it's fundamentally flawed.

"You have to be a bit careful with how you say these things," he added. "We are talking about it with F1. I think they understand where we are coming from as drivers. I think I speak for most of the drivers. Some, of course, will say it's great because they are winning races, which is fair enough. When you have an advantage, why would you give that up? Because you never know if you're going to have a good car again.

"But if you just speak to most of the drivers, it's not what we like. I don't think it's what the real F1 fans like. Maybe some fans like it, but they don't understand racing. Hopefully we can get rid of this as soon as possible."

While championship leader George Russell has thrown his weight behind the new rules, a revitalised Lewis Hamilton is also in favour of them.

"The cars are easier to follow, much better than past years," said the Briton. "You can get very close. There's not a bad wake where you're losing too much downforce. I think it's the best racing that I've ever experienced in Formula 1."

"We shouldn't do a knee-jerk reaction," added Haas boss, Ayao Komatsu, whose team is currently fourth in the standings, "because if you're going to change something, we should change it once and then get it right."

Check out our Sunday gallery from Shanghai here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Stitch431, 18/03/2026 11:17

"Regarding the point about the compression ratio row illustrating how 'clever' teams can be, I would reframe that. Since the hard limit is 16:1, exceeding it isn't working within the rules—it’s breaking them and hoping to evade detection. When a hard rule is violated, the FIA should be responsible for updating their measurement methods immediately; a rule break should have consequences. After all, if you steal an apple from a grocery store, are you clever or simply a thief? And if you don't get caught, does that make it okay?
As for Max’s remarks: He has been vocal about this throughout the two-year buildup to this formula. From his very first days in the simulator, he recognized exactly what was wrong with these regulations. As I’ve mentioned before, while there may be more overtaking now, it feels manufactured. If you’re at Mercedes or Ferrari, you’ll obviously defend the rules to protect your momentum, but these cars have neutralized the skill gap to the point where teammates are practically inseparable. It might look exciting to a newcomer, but for those who know the sport, this simply isn’t genuine racing anymore."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 18/03/2026 9:31

"@Celtic Tiger While I'm pretty sure that most teams are genuinely following the rules & that AI cannot directly control any part of the power train, I agree that the scope for "imaginative interpretation" will always be there...
This is the problem when "Sport" gets too entangled with global corporate greed: the incentives & the capability to cheat increase in direct proportion to the financial rewards of doing so."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 17/03/2026 18:25

"@Spindoctor - Fair enough and I would agree that, logically, an override of some sort can be deployed for safety reasons, however at the end of the day it's hard to tell how much AI's fingers are on it during race operation. Since this is all electronically controlled and the electronics are filtered through AI to a degree. The compression ratio row has illustrated how clever teams can get with the FIA's rules/guidelines so perhaps some teams are more conservative than others when using the AI, again, who really knows? and I think that's the rub in this hybrid, gimmick era we're neck deep in. We weren't doubting how much true control a driver had over their cars or legitimacy of overtakes before all of this."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Spindoctor, 17/03/2026 16:15

"I've just re-read Max's comment :

"I don't know, if someone likes this then you really don't know what racing is about,"

There's nothing worse than this kind of arrogance & believing your own & your Dad's PR.... "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Spindoctor, 17/03/2026 16:12

"@celtic tiger
There is AI involved (naturally!) but as I understand it drivers can override the AI which may noyt act autonomously. My guess would be that there's some kind of indicator (like for gear-changing) but no direct control from AI of anything in the car.

Drivers control energy deployment through:
* Boost button — overrides pre-set power-unit maps for maximum power or team-configured profiles
* Overtake Mode — gives attacking cars extra power for short bursts - driver controlled
* Manual control — drivers can close rear wings manually or they auto-close on braking/lifting

As Formula 1's official documentation states: "the throttle and energy-deployment logic remain under driver-initiated electronic control rather than autonomous AI management.""

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 17/03/2026 14:23

"In Australia, Hamilton had mentioned that AI is being used. I remember him saying something along the lines of the conditions being different at Albert Park from Bahrain for the AI to learn to know when and where to harvest and deploy the energy. In China he was on the radio begging for more power, why? because it's out of the drivers hands. AI decides when and where to harvest and deploy, even taking over the throttle input in cases if the driver isn't being as efficient as it wants in harvesting. That reality begs the question, how much are we really seeing driver skill and strategy in this new formula?
Max is right, when you have a driver's decision making ability in the car being overridden by AI systems, drivers passing not because they got a better exit than or out-braked their opponent but because their competitor is clipping is, as he stated, not racing. Although his statement of people liking this new formula don't know what racing is may put some noses out of joint, in a way, it does hold water. This is the new era of Fake1 where it seems that it's not only the PU that's 50/50, the driving is too."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Wokingchap, 17/03/2026 11:21

"@Spindoctor......i agree entirely with your comments, especially the last sentence including new/different driving skills. Even if it's a bit fake look at the great racing we're getting, and do hope that doesn't change as the teams get on top of it all."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Anthony, 16/03/2026 12:57

"As the old saying goes, sport can be entertainment but that doesn’t mean that entertainment is sport.

Hopefully the enforced month off in April will encourage some short term improvements. Perhaps reducing the electric power and its availability will put more emphasis on driving ability. I also rather like Karun Chandok’s longer term solution that the FIA should divide its categories more clearly- Formula E for electric, WEC for hybrids and F1 for naturally aspirated ICE. "

Rating: Positive (5)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Spindoctor, 16/03/2026 10:48

"Whilst there's lots I dislike about this version of F1, it is a bit dog in the manger of Max to complain too much.
The ground effect "era" which he largely dominated was characterised by cars (RBR & latterly McLaren excepted) which were utterly dependent on aero design & very finicky setup. Driving them was clearly at least as "Mario Cart"-like as these new ones: if the aero & setup came together it was largely a matter of driving around on rails, with the odd bit of tyre management. If not....

I'd also take issue with that "Mario Cart dismissal of the cars. The conserving & deploying energy is hardly a new departure for 2026. These cars are over-reliant on electrical energy and that can relatively easily be changed, though I can't see Mercedes agreeing too easily. Aside from the energy side, the cars require a lot more traditional "driving" skill from the drivers & some would argue the strategy & tactics of the electrical side adds an extra dimension to the skills required.
"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by Motorsport-fan, 16/03/2026 9:16

"The Mercedes performance surely cannot be because of the compression loophole, can it? i guess we will find out later in the season when said loophole is closed, for the purists amongst us this is the engineers racing not the drivers. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by yakker, 15/03/2026 19:32

"The Mercedes is no quicker than the Ferrari at the start of the race, but once 4 or 5 las are covered the Mercedes just drives away. Is it because the engine by this time has heated up enough to be 18:1 compression? And it seems the Mercedes still looks like it has more performance to spare.
"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by Superbird70, 15/03/2026 17:34

"The leader board also tends to focus on the between driver gaps for most of the race. Only occasionally, do we get a glimpse of how far back P6 etc really are. Last year when the racing through the field was closer we didn't see this.

They ( FIA, F1, the teams, and engine suppliers) knew this was coming over 6 months ago, and really just did nothing."

Rating: Positive (9)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2026. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms