Site logo

Hubris and the Drudge Reduction System

FEATURE BY MAX NOBLE
10/02/2026

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Or, as that glorious Canadian trio Rush put it (in Canadian French), "Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose."

This coming season sees the end of DRS, being the Drag Reduction System, something to which I'm sure Ru Paul would have serious objections... and the dawn of the moveable aero season. Pardon me for being silly... but wasn't DRS an item of moveable aero? Different name, same tiger stripes? Yet this time around DRS stands for "Drudge Reduction System". The last thing the FIA or Liberty Media want is constrained, skills-based, cat 'n' mouse racing! No, we need 151 overtakes a lap to keep the click-bait generation watching for one more crypto-currency ad.

Original DRS was introduced to take the drudge out of races which the FIA and Liberty claimed had become processions. Rather forgetting all those monster races of the 1950's and 1960's when the winning driver often did so by a margin of minutes, not seconds, and never hundredths!

Out on the roads of planet earth, the Lancia Thema of 1984 had a driver activated spoiler. The stunning Porsche 959 of 1986 used active aerodynamics via variable ride height. Then the 1988 VW Corrado was the first production road car with an automatically deploying rear wing. Closely followed by the 1990 Mitsubishi 3000GT which had active front and rear wings.

So, in 2026 the FIA are deploying (pun intended) moveable aero which Mitsubishi suppled to the general pubic 36 years ago. Good job guys! Very forward looking!

Back on the race track? Crude wings were used on the Porsche 550 spider back in 1956. Then Lotus placed them on the 1968 49B for Monaco that year. Can-Am cars also grew wings in the mid-1960's. (Let's not forget 1967 and Jim Hall's Chaparral 2F - Ed) Lotus were at it again with the 1977 Lotus 78 with advanced (for the time) side pods and a flexible aero skirt around the car. In 1978 Brabham added a fan to the BT46B to create their infamous fan car. This all ended with a ban on any form of skirts in 1982, until 2022 when ground effect was back in... until it was not for 2026. As you can see with F1 it really is the more things change the more they stay the same!

In Australia, due to a lovely amount of sunshine and no need to salt the roads in the winter (can the UK still afford to do that?) cars last a long time. I still see those glorious Mitsubishi 3000GT's on about a monthly basis. If Porsche, BMW or Audi had released it, today it would be considered a towering classic. As Mitsubishi released it today its status is that of a cult classic for a smaller group of car lovers. Yet, it is this moveable front and rear aero that the FIA is now presenting to the adoring fan base.

A rose by any other name? Well no. DRS by any other name. All in the name of spicing up the racing! The FIA Masters of removing Drudge!

So how will it be "Drudge Be Gone!" In 2026? With the current fan relationship with the FIA DBG might be a more fitting acronym standing for "Don't Bloody Get-it!"

I believe the FIA are leaving themselves so much wiggle room because they do not know how the It's "Not DRS System" (NDRSS) and the new electrical "Push to Piss-off Up-the-Road" PPUR system (the name already beloved by the Southern hemisphere Pitpass cats who love nothing better than a warm fire, an argument with the FIA and a good purr...) are going to interact. I've a nasty feeling they are going to discover that a clever driver can keep both safely in reserve to blast the fortunes of any poor soul sneaking up for an overtake. Your scribe is expecting a few comical moments at the start of the season before the FIA legislature springs into action and pummels the smart-arse teams with their big rubber mallet of equal opportunity and kills their advantage. Expect some "you don't see that every day" overtaking moments for the first few races.

Yet one team can challenge the FIA for hubris during this pre-season, being Audi. No doubt a tradition of excellence in the making.

Consider these oh so modest quotes dear reader...

From Jonathan Wheatley first... Having described their team launch as historic (for a team going back to its founding by August Horch in 1909 they actually already have a lot of history...) He then made a few choice statements.

"We're not here to mess around, it's an ambitious project. We're humble (!!). We know where we're starting from and we know where we want to go. We want to make Audi the most successful F1 team in history (I'll come back to this humble phrase in just a tick). There are milestones on that journey and we are starting today."

Gernot Dollner (Audi CEO) then tempered these fighting words with the far more reasoned... "Whenever we join a racing series, we join to win and to innovate and to bring motorsport forward. The ambition is to compete at the highest level and to compete for championships by 2030." - wow. No pressure then! Has he read the Toyota F1 story...?

Then their wonderful sound-bite slogan "To start something, stop at nothing". I'm sure there is a pile of caffeine and French champagne behind that one!

Then, to round out the hyper-quotes, we have this from Mattia Binotto (late of the Ferrari Parish, now Head of the Audi F1 project).

"Our approach to the journey. We are aware there may be (!) bumpy periods and failures, but to never stop, to have the passion to grow, it is the mindset to never stop pushing forward."

OK... to be most successful ever they need to eclipse a couple of modest numbers.

Between 1961 and 2008 Ferrari won the constructors' title 16 times. Next is McLaren on a mere ten titles between 1974 and 2025. Then we have Williams on nine championships between 1980 and 1997. Then we get to our two most recent power houses being Mercedes on eight championships between 2014 and 2021, and finally Red Bull on a half-hearted six between 2010 and 2023. But then Red Bull has won the Drivers' Championship eight times. V. Max being "let down" most recently by team mates in 2024, as he took the drivers' while the constructors' went to McLaren, then with 2021 being the other year this happened.

On their championship run Ferrari won 248 races. Indeed, the only other manufacturer on more than 200 wins is McLaren on 203. Then we have Mercedes on 131, with Red Bull just behind on 130.

And these are the figures Audi intends to beat?

It's great to have dreams. Last season McLaren won 14 of 24 races. This is a win percentage of 58%. Let's assume Audi instantly match this win rate, and maintain it. At that rate they only require 18 years to overtake Ferrari as the most winning of all time... assuming Ferrari win no races at all during that time. Not to mention that no one team has ever dominated for an 18 year streak! Mercedes became boring after a handful of years, as did Red Bull. Can we seriously imagine an 18 year winning streak for Audi!?

They say they want to challenge for the championship by 2030, so we need to add four more years to that 18 estimate. So, 22 years to become the most winning team ever being the year 2048. Mr. Wheatley will be 80 by then, Mattia a mere 78, while Nico will be a sprightly 60, and Gabriel a mere 43. So, all is possible!

Seriously what do these guys drink before talking to the press? Clearly not Red Bull. Maybe it's a fact that DRS now stands for "Delusion Reduction System". If so, Audi could do with fitting an upgrade soon.

Max Noble

Learn more about Max and check out his previous features, here

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

more features >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Max Noble, 13/02/2026 23:40

"@Spindoctor - Sadly an excellent summary of the situation. Back in the da our engineers used to say “Quality, Cost, Schedule. Pick any two.” Meaning if you pushed two of them to the maximum, then the third will without question suffer. I believe we can sum up for F1 as Liberty going, “Profits, Clicks (eye-balls), Sport. Pick any two.” And I think we all know which two they have backed…
"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 13/02/2026 12:55

"C'est la vie!
F1 suffers from either multiple personality disorder, or some form of what we used to call schizophrenia. This isn't that surprising. Since the estimable dynamic duo of Mosley & Ecclestone carved it up so F1 Management "owned" the "rights" to F1 for a century. Latterly Liberty stepped-in to augment Berine's pension by buying the *rights* from him.

To set the scene:
Ther's A Polyannaish analysis with the best of intentions in the best possible world we can assume FIA has little interest in filthy lucre & is concerned solely with "Sport". It wants to make a brilliant racing series.
Its "partner" Liberty, OTOH is solely about accumulating as much of that brass as it can get away with. Oh, & I nearly forgot the Teams : some of which might still be sport-focused, but others now about extracting 'shareholder value', values allegedly in the multiple billions.

This three-way-stretch doesn't make it likely that "Sport" will win out in the prognostications about Rules & Regs. That's precisely what has happened. As long as the gizmos make for "excitement" - My autocorrect inserted "excrement" - in the form of overtakes and\or crashes, controversy, punch-ups etc. all will be hunky dory, otherwise expect some "course-corrections"...

A final thought. Followers of Cory Doctorow will be familiar with his term "enshittification" - rude, but so accurate as a description of so many things now in the cold, dead hands of big corporations"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Max Noble, 12/02/2026 2:49

"@Pawsche - Great bit of history! It must have been the thickness of a tyre tread between them! That’s a mighty finish… and thankfully as you note 1971 is not the 1950’s or 60’s! ;-)
"

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Pawsche, 12/02/2026 0:00

"You reckoned "Rather forgetting all those monster races of the 1950's and 1960's when the winning driver often did so by a margin of minutes, not seconds, and never hundredths!"...?

I know that 1971 isn't "1950s and 1960s" - but it's only two years later - in the Italian GP at Monza that year Peter Gethin in a BRM beat Ronnie Peterson's March by 0.01 second (they only timed to the hundredth in those far-off days) and the first four home were only separated by 0.18 second. I think it's still the closest finish to an F1 race."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Superbird70, 11/02/2026 14:49

"Blackbird 66 Mk. 1 - no aero, more mechanical grip"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Motorsport-fan, 11/02/2026 10:41

""The more things change, the more they stay the same" was watching a 1930s restored old film recently and one part had the camera looking down a tram carriage and virtually everyone was reading a newspaper, fast forward to today and the same shot would have virtually everyone on there phone, nothing really changes just a different time.
On the aero front we seem to be in a cycle of allowing teams to put so much expensive aero on the car that the FIA then has to impose rules to make take away that aero at specific times for the sake of the show, surely would be sensible to not have so much in the first place! but along with rediculously expensive power units, how else are you going to spend all that money."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Max Noble, 11/02/2026 9:06

"@Tyrbiter - Glad you enjoyed! Sounds like your mate and his 3000GT were nearly as cheeky as James!

@Esteemed Editor - Oh for such characters now!"

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Tyrbiter, 10/02/2026 23:28

"James was a card wasn't he. And he really meant it.

Nowadays you'd be hard pressed to imagine an F1 driver being interested in a pretty girl outside of a PR shoot."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Editor, 10/02/2026 23:07 (moderated by an Adminstrator, 10/02/2026 23:07)

"@ Tyrbiter

Remember the "Sex, breakfast of champions" badge that James Hunt actually had sewn on his overalls?"

Rating: Positive (7)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by Tyrbiter, 10/02/2026 22:58 (moderated by an Adminstrator, 10/02/2026 23:07)

"A marvellous article Max, so much in it chimes with how I view the muppetry of modern F1.

A friend of mine had a Mitsubishi 3000GT. On the number plate it had the small addition of a grinning devil with pitchfork and the admonition to "Lock up your daughters!"

I don't think you will see such decals in F1."

Rating: Positive (5)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2026. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms